The Yankees, through a spokesman, declined to comment on the filing.
Forbes valued the Yankees at $7.55 billion in 2024, the highest among MLB teams. The Mets were sixth on the list at $3 billion.
The Mets have filed similar 2024 financial reports with MSRB, but the information is not yet available.
The Yankees’ previous high total of reported ticket and luxury suite sales was approximately $397 million in 2009, which was the first year of the current Yankee Stadium. The Yankees won the World Series that season.
In the filing, the Yankees added a footnote: “The significant costs associated with the postseason [e.g., players share, visiting teams share, stadium operation, etc.] need to be considered in assessing the financial results of the postseason.”
In their seven postseason home games, the Yankees averaged $14.5 million per game in ticket and luxury suite revenue.
“It’s in a way a wild question, right?” Boland said. “Why aren’t more teams thinking about this potential revenue that relates to a postseason run and the opportunity to go into the playoffs? But I think it actually kind of goes with the idea that the management of risk and the economics of the game set it up that there are two ways to be effective economically in baseball. The first is to spend a lot and win the World Series, or go to the World Series, like the Yankees have, and the other is to spend very little and rely on the overall revenue of the game.”
The Yankees had a payroll of nearly $311 million, according to figures from Major League Baseball obtained by The Associated Press. That was second to the Mets, who reached the NLCS with a payroll of $333.2 million. The Dodgers were third at $270.8 million, but that figure does not include the full value of the $680 million Los Angeles deferred in superstar Shohei Ohtani’s 10-year, $700 million contract, which he signed before the 2024 season.
The Yankees are projected by Cot’s Baseball Contracts to go into this season with a payroll of $304.7 million, which is fourth behind the Dodgers ($333.3 million), Mets ($326.2 million) and Phillies ($307.8 million). The season opens for most teams on March 27.
Owner Hal Steinbrenner said on Feb. 21: “Does having a huge payroll really increase my chances that much of winning the championship? I’m not sure there’s a strong correlation there. Having said that, we’re the New York Yankees, we know what our fans expect. We’re always going to be one of the highest in payroll. That’s not going to change. And it certainly didn’t change this year.”
Payrolls in MLB last year ranged all the way down to the A’s, who spent $66.4 million on players in their final season in Oakland.
The range of those figures — which mainly has to do with wild disparities in MLB’s local TV revenue and market size differences — has fans and the players’ union worried that not enough teams are spending enough to win.
“The problem is at times in the history of baseball that you have a few teams that can pay, that are paying, and what is the competitive balance?” said Mark Conrad, professor of law and ethics at Fordham University and the director of its sports business concentration. “Although there have been teams with lesser payrolls that do well. But it does make it more challenging, and especially with the Dodgers just pushing their way in the wake of winning the World Series, it creates challenges for teams, even like the Yankees, apparently, to keep up.
“The Yankees, yes, they can spend and they’re making money. The Dodgers are spending money and making oodles of money, from what we hear. But the other reason is their broadcast deals, because the Dodgers’ home cable deal is enormously lucrative. The Yankees are not bad because they own part of YES [Network]. If you’re the Kansas City Royals, if you’re the Minnesota Twins, you’re not going to have those goodies at your disposal.”
The Newsday app makes it easier to access content without having to log in.