A TB (tuberculosis) patient after being administered medication at a...

A TB (tuberculosis) patient after being administered medication at a clinic in Durban, South Africa on Oct. 17, 2005. Medical advocacy groups have welcomed Johnson & Johnson's decision not to enforce its patent on a critical tuberculosis medication, allowing its production at much lower prices. The move comes after South African authorities opened an investigation into the conglomerate. Credit: AP/Themba Hadebe

CAPE TOWN, South Africa — Medical advocacy groups have welcomed Johnson & Johnson’s decision not to enforce its patent on a critical tuberculosis medication, allowing its production at much lower prices, after South African authorities opened an investigation into the conglomerate.

The South African Competition Commission in a statement on July 5 said it decided not to prosecute a complaint against J&J regarding “allegations of abuse of dominance,” which was prompted after J&J and its subsidiary filed a secondary patent for bedaquiline last year, used to treat drug-resistant TB.

Experts argued that the patent prevented generic producers from making cheaper medicines, threatening the treatment of tens of thousands of people in South Africa. TB killed more than 50,000 people there in 2021, making it the country’s leading cause of death.

Authorities said J&J has agreed not to enforce its patent and to drop the price charged to South Africa by about 40%.

“We hope this sends a strong message to pharma that they cannot continue their anti-competitiveness monopoly and prioritize profits over people's lives,” said Candice Sehoma, an advocacy adviser at Doctors Without Borders in South Africa.

Sehoma told The Associated Press on Tuesday that she hoped generic manufacturers in South Africa would be able to start producing bedaquiline in the coming years, adding that Indian factories already make the drug.

Last year, activists in countries including India, Belarus and Ukraine protested against efforts by J&J to protect its patent on bedaquiline, but had little response. J&J applied to have its South Africa patent extended until 2027, enraging activists who accused it of profiteering.

The Johnson & Johnson headquarters in New Brunswick, New Jersey,...

The Johnson & Johnson headquarters in New Brunswick, New Jersey, on February 8, 2024. South African authorities have dropped an investigation into Johnson & Johnson for alleged anti-competitive practices after the company agreed not to enforce its patent on a critical TB medication, a move that should allow generic producers to make the drug at much lower prices. Credit: AP/Ted Shaffrey

In an unusual move challenging the influence of big pharmaceuticals, the South African government then began investigating the company’s pricing policies. The country had been paying about 5,400 rand ($282) per treatment course, far more than poor countries that got the drug via a global effort called the Stop TB Partnership.

Fatima Hassan, the founder of the activist group Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, pointed out that patenting strategies for other key medicines for diseases including HIV, cancer and cystic fibrosis might also be investigated by regulatory agencies for their pricing policies.

“Going forward, pharmaceutical corporations need to be held in check and to account," Hassan said in a statement.

Families and politicians are demanding a new study of cancer and other illnesses in the area where Grumman’s toxic waste polluted the soil and groundwater. NewsdayTV's Virginia Huie and Newsday investigative reporter Paul LaRocco report. Credit: Newsday Staff; File Footage; Photo Credit: Jessica Ostrowski

'What we could do is save the future' Families and politicians are demanding a new study of cancer and other illnesses in the area where Grumman's toxic waste polluted the soil and groundwater. NewsdayTV's Virginia Huie and Newsday investigative reporter Paul LaRocco report.

Families and politicians are demanding a new study of cancer and other illnesses in the area where Grumman’s toxic waste polluted the soil and groundwater. NewsdayTV's Virginia Huie and Newsday investigative reporter Paul LaRocco report. Credit: Newsday Staff; File Footage; Photo Credit: Jessica Ostrowski

'What we could do is save the future' Families and politicians are demanding a new study of cancer and other illnesses in the area where Grumman's toxic waste polluted the soil and groundwater. NewsdayTV's Virginia Huie and Newsday investigative reporter Paul LaRocco report.

Latest videos

SUBSCRIBE

Unlimited Digital AccessOnly 25¢for 5 months

ACT NOWSALE ENDS SOON | CANCEL ANYTIME ONLINE